Filibusters: A History
May 16, 2005
Amy Ridenour from the National Center for Public Policy Research shares the following from the Senate Republican Conference.
Great Stuff!
Sphere: Related ContentDates Democrats Want to Forget
1787
The year the U.S. Constitution was ratified without the filibuster as part of it1789
The year the Senate was originally constituted with rules that permitted a majority vote to end debate1806
The year that the filibuster became theoretically possible through an inadvertent rules change1837
The year that a filibuster was used for the first time to block legislation1917
The year that a “cloture” rule was adopted to control legislative filibusters1949
The year that the Senate rules were changed to extend cloture to all debatable matters, including nominations1968
The first time a bipartisan filibuster was used to deny a judicial nominee an up-or-down vote. But the nominee, Abe Fortas to be Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, did not have majority support, and was opposed by one-third of his own party. He withdrew his nomination shortly after the failed cloture vote. In contrast, every one of the filibustered judicial nominees in 2003 and 2004 had majority support.1977, 1979, 1980, 1987
The years in which then Senate Majority-Leader Robert Byrd employed the constitutional option in order to limit minority and individual Senators’ rights2003, 2004
The years in which partisan filibusters were used for the first time to deny confirmation to a judicial nominee with majority support. Ten nominees were blocked from getting up-or-down votes due to the filibuster2005
The year the Senate will restore the 214-year tradition of up-or-down votes on every judicial nominee with majority support
Comments
Got something to say?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Advertisement
